On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 19:57 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hey Folks!
>
> Toolbx is very necessary and is becoming very important. It provides
> the basic and core
> functionality for many users who use immutable OS as daily driver for
> installing apps with
> dnf. In many cases, help devs manage deps, libs and envs.
> Functional breakage of Toolbx causes distress and many folks might be
> actually running
> apps inside and if after "dnf update" things fall apart[0], that's great UX.
>
> I want to mark Toolbx rpm as crit-path.. thoughts?
> Any ideas on how to go about this?
Well, per my change to the critpath definition recently:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_path_package&diff=686714&oldid=599546
(this was proposed and agreed in 2022 but I forgot to change it), the
thing to do would be to get one or more editions, spins or labs to
declare that toolbx is critpath for them.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net
Hey Adam,
We have the ack from Workstation Working Group [0]
It's still not implemented and I would like to learn how to do it! :)
Any guidance will be awesome :D
--
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
