I usually run DNF via an automation script of mine, and I noticed it
complained there was no /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file available (my script
checks it and warns if there are active excludes in it).
My dnf.conf had become dnf.conf.rpmnew which is why my automation script
complained. However /usr/bin/dnf was still pointing at dnf-3, not dnf5.
So it disabled my config for dnf-3 but didn't migrate me over all the
way to dnf5?
Should I manually point the dnf link to dnf5?
As a separate issue, I do have an active exclude (coreutils, pending a
revert of a recent change that introduced an undesirable feature).
Where does one put the "exclude=coreutils" in a dnf5 world? Note right
now I don't have a functioning /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file (it got renamed to
dot rpmnew)
Ian
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue