On 5/10/23 15:08, wang_chen wrote:
# dnf install vtk-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:05:17 ago on Thu May 11 05:59:18 2023. Error: Problem: package vtk-devel-9.2.5-2.fc38.i686 requires libpq-devel(x86-32), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - libpq-devel-15.0-3.fc38.i686 has inferior architecture - package vtk-devel-9.2.5-2.fc38.x86_64 requires libpq-devel(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed - package libpq-devel-15.0-3.fc38.x86_64 requires libpq(x86-64) = 15.0-3.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package libpq5-15.2-42.1PGDG.f38.x86_64 - installed package libpq5-15.2-42.1PGDG.f38.x86_64 obsoletes libpq provided by libpq-15.0-3.fc38.x86_64 - package libpq5-15.2-42.1PGDG.f38.x86_64 obsoletes libpq provided by libpq-15.0-3.fc38.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) [root@robot pgsql]# dnf list libpq* --installed Installed Packages libpq5.x86_64 15.2-42.1PGDG.f38 @pgdg-common libpq5-devel.x86_64 15.2-42.1PGDG.f38 @pgdg-common libpqxx.x86_64 1:7.7.5-10.f38 @pgdg-common libpqxx-devel.x86_64 1:7.7.5-10.f38 @pgdg-common
Why are you installing libpq from an external repository instead of using the one included with Fedora?
Your problem is that you're installing the 32-bit version of vtk-devel which is causing complications with the libpq availability.
Also, this is not relevant to the test list. F38 is released and external repositories are not Fedora's problem. This is a question for the users list.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
