On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 6:21 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912650 > > Does openqa only do qcow2 tests? I'm not seeing raw tests. I'm just > curious for another data point. :P > > I'm seeing Rawhide and 33 images passing (couple warn, no fail). And > on 34 only x86_64 fail, but all of them fail and they're all failing > at the firmware as if it's not finding a bootloader at all. Hence > wondering if there might be a difference between raw and qcow2... OK I think it doesn't matter because: (in case mua munging happens with my paste) https://paste.centos.org/view/49c75eb9 # dd if=Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210620.0.x86_64.raw count=1 2>/dev/null | hexdump -C 00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 000001c0 02 00 ee ff ff ff 01 00 00 00 ff ff 7f 00 00 00 |................| 000001d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 000001f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 aa |..............U.| 00000200 # That's clearly wrong... No bootloader in LBA 0. And if I understand correctly, the raw and qcow2 come from the same image. The qcow2 comes from qemu-img convert (raw to qcow2) so that'd explain the openqa failure on the qcow2. Busted! I don't see a grub2-install command in this log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/Fedora-Cloud-Base/34/20210620.0/data/logs/image/oz-x86_64.log I'm not sure if it should be in that log with the rest of the anaconda stuff though. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
