Re: /boot on btrfs

[TheEvilSkeleton <theevilskeleton@xxxxxxxxxx>]

A couple of days ago I tried to manually install Fedora 34 Silverblue on UEFI system and it kept failing when I was using /boot on btrfs. When I switched to ext4, it installed flawlessly. I will try it soon on the ISO you linked and will report back if this issue persists or not.

On April 1, 2021 7:44:06 PM EDT, FUNG Chi Chuen Sampson <sampsonfung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Anaconda do not complain about /boot partition using btrfs, as tested with https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-34-20210401.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210401.n.0.iso

Testing steps:

1.  Boot the USB
2.  Choose Custom Storager
3.  Remove All existing partitions
4.  By using the default btrfs scheme, choose to create the default layout
5.  Edit /boot, change type to btrfs
6.  Result:
- /dev/sda1 - 1GB, btrfs
- /dev/sda2 - 180GB, btrfs
* subvol /
* subvol /home
(It is on a legacy BIOS system, so no EFI partition created.)
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure