Maybe we should look at the Silverblue criteria, it seems that IoT and Sliverblue share some similarities
On Sep 7 2020, at 10:32 pm, Geoffrey Marr <gmarr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi everyone,As Fedora IoT is an official edition now, the Fedora QA team finds it necessary to merge the existing Fedora IoT release criteria [0] into the existing criteria [1]. As it stands however, the IoT criteria have not been "rated" as to which criteria go where; Basic, Beta, or Final.The purpose of my email is to start a discussion on how to "rate" each criterion listed [0]. Should there be different versions of each criterion for Basic, Beta, and Final? Are some more important and as such, expected to work from inception (Basic)? Which are these?Fedora QA would like to have the official Fedora QA criteria page [1] updated soon, (certainly before F33 launch), so that there is an established quality standard to which IoT will reach.Thanks for reading.Geoff MarrIRC: coremodule_______________________________________________test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelinesList Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
