Re: user switching criterion proposal

[Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:58 PM Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 5/12/20 1:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:51 PM Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

Work?
The switching mechanism must correctly attempt the requested operation. If the operation doesn't work on a subset of graphical drivers, the release blocking decision should be based on the number of affected users, the problem severity and available workarounds (as is our [standard procedure](Basic_Release_Criteria#Basic_Release_Requirements)[3]).

[snip]

I didn't receive much feedback so far. But since there was enough supportive feedback in our preliminary discussions, I take it as an agreement with the current criterion phrasing :-) I'll wait a few more days for more feedback, and if no one objects, I'll make the criterion live.

I think the snipped section should read more definitively, maybe:

"The switching mechanism must correctly perform the requested operation. If the operation does not succeed on a subset of graphical drivers, the release blocking decision should be based on the number of affected users, the problem severity, and available workarounds (as is our [standard procedure (Basic_Release_Criteria#Basic_Release_Requirements)[3])."

Thanks. "Succeed" sounds better than "work" in the second sentence. As for "attempt" vs "perform" - just to be sure, have you seen my response to Lukas Ruzicka where I was talking about it? Do you still think the wording should be stronger after seeing those other examples I listed?

_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx