On 2020-04-21 19:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 09:41 ToddAndMargo via test <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:On 2020-04-21 18:36, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-04-22 08:21, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: >> Now the 64,000 dollar question is, is this a bug >> or normal operation? > > It is an issue for the Brave distribution to address. Not related to Fedora. > So, rpm was not suppose to overwrite the key? Sound a lot like an rpm bug to me. You will recall that the public key in installed as a separate act.
Not to beat a dead horse, but was that act performed by "rpm" (a Fedora package) suppose to have overwritten the previous key or just existed without an error message?
Both the act of installing the key as well as the brave-browser are not supplied or supported by the Fedora Community.
This is why my question is about the behavior of rpm not Brave _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
