On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 16:16 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > I use the functionality daily, so I'm biased, same as mattdm. I consider it > really a basic desktop functionality. On our home laptop, my wife never > logs out. Why would she, she just closes the lid and the laptop goes to > sleep. When I want to do something, I simply log it as my own user, do what > I need, and again shut the lid. I reboot the laptop twice a month when I > apply updates. There is almost never just a single user logged in. The idea > that we only validate Fedora for a single-user scenario, where the whole > system can be used just by a single user at any moment, feels... almost > obscene given our UNIX heritage :-) In the past when we had some user > switching issues, it was a huge pain for me, because my wife will never > remember Ctrl+Alt+Fx shortcuts to workaround a framebuffer switching > problem. And constantly making sure the other person is not logged in, and > asking him/her to log out if he/she is, is nothing but a headache. It makes > the home laptop use case completely broken. Not to mention it's really hard > to answer her questions about why we're using something that broken. My use case is slightly different. I like to be able to log into a basic user configuration to test something, without logging out of my current session. That second desktop might even be running Gnome rather than KDE. Would that also count as a blocker? poc _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
