Testing with NVMe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




At last Monday's meeting there was mention of a need to start testing with NVMe. I volunteered to get some and help with that. Part of my motivation was the desire to become familiar with it and see if it's something I might have an application for. NVMe seems to have been created created mostly for servers and a few other applications that need extremely fast data access and flow from "disk". From what I've seen the newer 19" rack servers offer a NVMe slot on the board.

One thing that seems rather puzzling is that NVMe is offered in three different connection configurations. PCI-E, USB (with a USB connector), and SSD via SATA (with an SATA connector. Since multichannel PCI-E is very much faster that either USB or SATA I don't really understand why the USB and SATA options are offered. It seems a bit like having a car that's designed and built for racing and only driving it on city streets.

From the various conversations with the test folks over time, it seems many in the group test on laptops. Many of the newer lap tops have a connector on the motherboard that connects an NVMe to PCI-E. This and the above leads me to believe that the testing we want to do is with NVMe on PCI-E. That's what I'm planning at this time.

I have only desktops none of the ones I support have such a slot on the mother board. No worries; There are PCI-E adapter boards that NVMe modules can be plugged into then the board plugs into a standard PCI-E four channel slot. This is the route I'm planning to go.

The complication is that there are different kinds of NVMe modules and the PCI-E boards have different configurations as well. At this point I think I will get a board for "M.2" modules and a module to go with it. There are still some points I want to investigate before I go ahead. I want read some of the module data sheets in detail to see if there are any GotYas that need to be considered. Also I want to see what the "raw" formatting of the module looks like and if it changes from brand to brand or with module capacity. My observation has been that manufacturers always want a "competitive advantage" and sometimes those "advantages" can turn into "let the buyer beware".

In regard to actual procurement. Many of the modules require heat sinking most of the adapter boards provide at least some minimal provision for adding a heat sink. Others come complete with all required hardware for heat sinking. This gets a bit tricky. The modules provide the specifications necessary to calculate temperature rise from modules heat dissipating surface. I still need to find an adapter card with the corresponding specifications. so a complete thermal analysis can be done.

A final point of interest is that there are some NVMe modules that are being called SATA instead of just being called NVMe. I would be think that pretending to be an SATA-SSD drive would just a superficial matter the desktop would handle and the highs peed data access and flow would be handled in a very light weight protocol in the kernel. This is just a guess, but I would think that using the SATA protocol would slow things down. Since NVMes apparently exist for applications with a huge need to speed I guess I don't understand this.

Any comments or suggestions are always welcome

	Stay Safe and Well!

	Pat	(tablepc)
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux