On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:02 AM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Until FESCo/FPM/whoever get around to publishing the F31 list, yes, > treat it as such. I don't think there are planned to be any changes for > F31. > Correct. In fact, you can consider the current list to be the same in perpetuity (or until someone includes a modification in an approved change proposal). After the Fedora 30 blockers were approved, FESCo approved a change to the process[1] that boils down to: "the program manager will send an announcement of the release-blocking artifacts a week before the branch date." If branch-minus-a-week is too late in the process for QA's purposes, I'm happy to do it earlier. Pretty much any time after the System-Wide Change proposal deadline would work. My intent was to have it be a static page, but I'm about a year behind in moving stuff to docs.fedoraproject.org (which is pretty impressive since I've only been on the job 13 months), so I'll create the wiki page now and think about how I want to present it in the future. (Feel free to email me off-list or stop by my regular FPgM office hours[2] if you have ideas on how it should look. There are a few other release-specific program management things that might end up being moved out of the wiki and into docs). [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2108 [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9527/ -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
