Fedora 31 Blocker status email #1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oh wow, it's already that time in the Fedora 31 release cycle. Welcome
to the first Fedora 31 Beta blocker status email!

Action summary
====================

Accepted blockers
-----------------
1. bes — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728419
ACTION: Server WG to decide if it makes sense to include "a DAP
server" in the optional packages for the web-server group.

2. libdnf — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727343
ACTION: QA to verify libdnf-0.35.1-2 fixes the bug

Proposed blockers
-----------------

1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732620
ACTION: anaconda maintainers to build new package which includes upstream fix

2. gnome-shell — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731908
ACTION: gnome-shell maintainers to verify the issue is resolved after rebuild

3. initial-setup — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731415
ACTION: initial-setup maintainers to diagnose issue

4. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388
ACTION: QA team to determine if btrfs should be excluded from blocker
criteria and perhaps propose dropping it from the installer

5. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715699
ACTION: decide if this qualifies as a blocker

Bug-by-bug detail
=============

Accepted blockers
-----------------
1. bes — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728419 — NEW
bes not installable: needs rebuild, probably update to 3.20.5

Package was added to comps to replace dap-server package which no
longer exists. It's unclear if the comps group should continue to
carry bes as an optional package. If it can be
dropped, this is no longer a blocker. If it should remain, the bes
package needs to be fixed.

2. libdnf — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727343 — ON_QA
PackageKit: libdnf::Repo::Impl::detachLibsolvRepo(): packagekitd
killed by SIGSEGV

Appears to be fixed in libdnf-0.35.1-2.


Proposed blockers
-----------------
1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732620 — MODIFIED
FreeIPA enrolment via kickstart fails since
Fedora-Rawhide-20190722.n.1 (anaconda-31.20-1.fc31), 'realm join' step
not run at all

Fix merged upstream: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2052

2. gnome-shell — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731908 — NEW
After upgrading gnome-shell, mutter and gnome-desktop3 to version
3.33.4-1 disappear login screen

Suspected to be related to a soname bump in libgnome-desktop. If so,
it will be resolved when components are rebuilt against the new
version.

3. initial-setup — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731415 — NEW
Network spoke doesn't work on ARM initial-setup

Selecting the "network setup" spoke causes installation to hang on
Raspberry Pi 3.

4. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388 — NEW
Circular locking often causes btrfs installs to hang with
kernel-5.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc31 and later

Installations since kernel-5.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc31 often fail during
package installation. The kernel team proposes excluding btrfs from
any blocker criteria.

5. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715699 — POST
LiveOS boot, journalctl is missing many early messages

Rejected as a blocker previously, but renominated. The question is:
does missing the first ~25 seconds of log messages violate the "is
working" part of the logging criterion?

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux