Re: Fedora Rawhide-20190625.n.0 compose check report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 17:45 +0000, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
> 
> Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
> Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
> 
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 3 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
> openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below

So, quite a few of these failures were down to some appearance changes
in GNOME; I've updated the needles and am re-running those tests in
prod now.

Dusty, Colin, and atomic@ : you got this mail because fedfind / check-
compose considered the Atomic Host images to be "missing", and I just
implemented a thing in check-compose yesterday to send you reports when
there is an Atomic-related failure (like we used to do with the
separate Fedora-Atomic composes):

https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose/issue/2

there is of course a bug there - fedfind shouldn't consider Atomic Host
to be expected for Rawhide any more. I noticed that problem for F30+
updates composes and fixed it prior to rolling out the new check-
compose, but didn't notice it also needed fixing for Rawhide and
Branched. I will fix that now and send a new fedfind out.

Here are some notes on the real failures:

> Failed openQA tests: 18/137 (x86_64), 3/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> 
> ID: 415492	Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415492

This fails every day because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691030 . I wonder if we
should adjust the test not to expect it at this point, since it's been
broken for three months.

> ID: 415528	Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415528

This one is a test issue, KDE just keeps changing how updates and
notifications work and it's driving me nuts.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716005 does not help
either. I'll keep trying to make this reliable.

> ID: 415532	Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415532

Both failures here are test issues (one not waiting long enough before
closing the app, one got sandbagged by an 'updates available'
notification popping up over the button it was trying to press, thanks
again KDE...)

> ID: 415534	Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415534

This has just been failing forever, it's probably just emulation
issues. We should probably take this test out as I never have time to
maintain it. Ideally we want to run 32-bit ARM tests on aarch64 hosts,
but haven't got around to that yet either.

> ID: 415591	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415591
> ID: 415608	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415608

These two go together...I need to look into it further but it looks
like perhaps DNS stops working on the server after the upgrade, as the
client's attempt to refresh repos when it goes to run its own upgrade
fails.

> ID: 415601	Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled **GATING**
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/415601

This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722979 , mkolman
has a fix for it under review ATM.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux