Today's move to selinux-policy 3.14.4-9 fixed this for me -- thanks kindly, follks! On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:21 AM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 09:41 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm writing to confirm that "enforcing=0" on the relevant kernel brings > > up gdm OK, and things seem correct. > > > > Should we file a bug against this, or add to > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697667 > > > > Also, FWIW, I am subscribed to the list but didn't get Adam's response > > directly, but I expect this to sort itself out, since I added myself to > > the list only minutes before posting... > > Just add a note to the same bug, for now. If that bug gets closed but > you still have problems, file a new one :) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Boyan Penkov _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
