On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Adam Williamson composed on 2019-03-21 10:28 (UTC-0400): > > > On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 04:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > > Host fi965 > > > happened again :~( > > Well, people did make some suggestions before - notably including > > libdnf, which you don't seem to have done this time. Why didn't you try > > that? > > I tried what I was able to figure out given the limited instructions > > > If it worked it would have suggested some kind of not- > > sufficiently-strict dep between dnf and libdnf is likely the problem. > > I tried package version matching for *dnf* and found no differences between what > was on mirrors and what was installed. There are/were about 3-4 sets of versions > among the dozen or so packages. I agree this must be some kind of failed dep > problem. It's quite disconcerting seeing it happen right after announcing a fresh > F30 testing request. This kind of piecemeal updating is not supported, so it doesn't really affect the release process. All the recommended update methods for Fedora involve updating all packages together. Did you check librepo? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
