On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:56 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > "Work" is defined as the output from the device matching a preview > shown on the GNOME print preview display. (Note that non-ridiculous > differences in color reproduction are not considered "non-working". In > general, we'll apply the "last blocker at Go/No-Go" principle here > when deciding whether a print glitch is truly blocking.) > > and this to Final for Fedora 30+: > * Printing must work (as defined above) on at least one printer using > each of the following drivers: > - The built-in print-to-PDF driver > - The generic IPP driver > * For each blocking desktop, it must be possible to print: > - A test page from the desktop environment's built-in "test page" > feature, if such a feature exists. > - A simple text document of at least 100 words (lorem ipsum) from > the standard basic text editor accompanying that desktop. > > This does not mean that all printers need to function properly that > use the IPP driver, just that at least one does (so we > know that printing as a whole is unbroken). We won't specify any > particular hardware makes or models that must work. I think "generic IPP driver" needs to be more specifically stated. There's IPP protocol versions 1.1, 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. The "driverless" specification is IPP Everywhere, which uses IPP protocol versions 2.0 or higher, along with additional requirements to support driverless device discovery and printing of text and images. There isn't strictly speaking a generic IPP driver, although PCL and PostScript are common. What supports IPP Everywhere out of the box? Any computer running CUPS 1.5 or later Mobile devices running Android 4.4 and later Proposal for Fedora 30: If anyone is able to, with reasonable effort, successfully run the agreed test cases to any printer supporting IPP 2.0 or higher, using whatever driver is required, then we don't block. Proposal for Fedora 31: If anyone is able to, with reasonable effort, successfully run the agreed test cases to any IPP Everywhere printer, then we don't block. Something I need to dig into deeper is how to create a virtual IPP Everywhere printer (a service); which would be useful for testing, in particular automated testing such that the virtual printer itself says "yes this is a valid print job". But also it might be possible to bridge the virtual IPP Everywhere printer with a conventional CUPS+gimp/foomatic driver based printer. If so, I'm thinking Fedora IoT on a Raspberry Pi Zero W, using a static containerized approach, that once working, should be a reliable indicator that any failures coinciding with print pipeline changes in the client, are in fact client bugs. But we'll see about that. This might be useful: IPP Everywhere mini-tutorial https://github.com/apple/cups/wiki/IPP-(Everywhere)-Mini-Tutorial Other references: IPP Everywhere FAQ: https://www.pwg.org/ipp/evefaq.html IPP Everywhere self-certified printers list: https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/eveprinters.php -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
