Re: proposal: drop optical media from release criteria

[Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:17 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 01:49:20PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Justification: http://newsthump.com/2018/05/21/man-decides-to-keep-box-of-cables-hes-has-since-2002-for-another-year/

More seriously: I don't think there are any systems in the audiences
targeted by our release-blocking deliverables which are not better served by
booting from USB media.

Speaking for I believe most of the QA team: "We'd be happy to". Testing optical boot is a major PITA. The decision is not ours, though, but I assume it belongs to the groups owning the media currently blocking optical boot. Which is Spins SIG for Everything netinst and Workstation WG for Workstation Live [1] (to be clear, nothing else is currently covered by that criterion, just those two images).

One more thing, Matthew, are you proposing we drop this for F30, or immediately for F29?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/ReleaseBlocking

_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx