Re: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 10:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 17:06 +0000, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:21 PM pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx <pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Since the Gnome 3.28.0 test object for today was delivered as
> > > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso, I went ahead and did
> > > the rest of the testing. I was surprised when I could not report the
> > > results. relval said there was no test event for 20180324.n.0. Did I do
> > > something wrong
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello. Maybe someone else can explain better than me.
> > However, every day one or more composes are produced (let's call them
> > nightly builds) but you can report the results (directly on the wiki or via
> > relval) only on composes nominated for test (test event). Such nomination
> > is made automatically based on some heuristic rules.
> > In fact, if you visit the wiki page containing the results [1] you are not
> > supposed to find the latest compose, but instead the last nominated for
> > testing.
> > I think you can find more info here [2].
> > 
> > I hope I didn't wrote anything wrong.
> 
> This is exactly correct, yes. A compose is attempted for Rawhide every
> single day (at least), and a compose is attempted for Branched every
> day that Branched exists. However, we do not create validation events
> for every single compose, so as not to overwhelm people with events
> (and the wiki with result pages).
> 
> The rules for when an event is created are a bit complex, but it's more
> or less this:
> 
> 1. We *never* automatically create events closer than 3 days together
> 
> 2. If it's been 14 days since the last event, there will *definitely*
> be an event for the next successful compose
> 
> 3. If a compose succeeds and it's been more than 3 days but less than
> 14 days since the last event, then a new event will be created if any
> of a hand-maintained list of 'important' packages changed since the
> last event. If not, there won't be an event.
> 
> So yep, you can't expect there to be an event for every compose, at
> least the way we do things at present.

Oh, forgot one very important rule. 1 isn't quite true, in the above
list. Proper list:

1. An event is *always* created for any successful candidate compose
(the ones we manually request from releng, as compared to the automatic
'nightly' composes...RCs are candidate composes).

1. We *never* automatically create an event for a new nightly compose
if it's been less than 3 days since the previous event.

2. If it's been 14 days since the last event, we will *definitely*
automatically create an event for the next successful compose.

3. If a compose succeeds and it's been more than 3 days but less than
14 days since the last event, then a new event will be created if any
of a hand-maintained list of 'important' packages changed since the
last event. If not, there won't be an event.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux