Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot be boot up after upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok. Thanks!

Bowen

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:21:31PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 22:21 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> > After I upgraded my rawhide to 0811(I am not very sure about the date, but it
> > should be around this date), the system cannot be boot up even after I did the
> > upgrade on 0815.
> > 
> > Here are the output from dmesg(I get this information using ssh):
> > [   18.986579] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): enp3s0: link is not ready
> > [   18.988601] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): enp3s0: link is not ready
> > [   21.619237] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
> > [   21.619654] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
> > [   23.969115] systemd-udevd[1126]: link_config: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
> > [   23.969292] systemd-udevd[1126]: Could not generate persistent MAC address for virbr0: No such file or directory
> > [   23.989317] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
> > [   23.989688] systemd-journald[1130]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   23.991398] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered blocking state
> > [   23.991403] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
> > [   23.991453] systemd-journald[1130]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   23.991484] device virbr0-nic entered promiscuous mode
> > [   23.993860] systemd-udevd[1133]: link_config: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
> > [   24.005632] systemd-journald[1135]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   24.005941] systemd-journald[1135]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   24.018793] systemd-journald[1138]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   24.019090] systemd-journald[1138]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   24.031254] systemd-journald[1141]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   24.031572] systemd-journald[1141]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   24.043386] systemd-journald[1144]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   24.043691] systemd-journald[1144]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   24.181318] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered blocking state
> > [   24.181330] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered listening state
> > [   24.299972] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
> > [   24.648320] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c1.
> > [   24.705753] systemd-logind[871]: New session c2 of user gdm.
> > [   25.212613] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c2.
> > [   25.256314] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   25.285529] systemd-logind[871]: New session c3 of user gdm.
> > 
> > [   27.249568] ======================================================
> > [   27.249569] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > [   27.249570] 4.13.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc27.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
> > [   27.249571] ------------------------------------------------------
> > [   27.249572] Xorg/1344 is trying to acquire lock:
> > [   27.249572]  (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc04c68b8>] i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x118/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249618] 
> >                but task is already holding lock:
> > [   27.249619]  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc04c6c6b>] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x19b/0x350 [i915]
> > [   27.249639] 
> >                which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > 
> > [   27.249640] 
> >                the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > [   27.249641] 
> >                -> #1 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> > [   27.249647]        lock_acquire+0xa3/0x1f0
> > [   27.249658]        drm_gem_object_put_unlocked+0x3d/0xb0 [drm]
> > [   27.249690]        validate_fini_no_ticket+0xf5/0x130 [nouveau]
> > [   27.249708]        nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf+0x65f/0x10f0 [nouveau]
> > [   27.249716]        drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5d/0xb0 [drm]
> > [   27.249721]        drm_ioctl+0x31b/0x3d0 [drm]
> > [   27.249736]        nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x72/0xc0 [nouveau]
> > [   27.249738]        do_vfs_ioctl+0xa6/0x6c0
> > [   27.249739]        SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> > [   27.249741]        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
> > [   27.249742] 
> >                -> #0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> > [   27.249745]        __lock_acquire+0x1367/0x13b0
> > [   27.249747]        lock_acquire+0xa3/0x1f0
> > [   27.249748]        __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.9+0xa1/0x10c0
> > [   27.249749]        ww_mutex_lock+0x5e/0x70
> > [   27.249769]        i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x118/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249782]        i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x1b4/0x350 [i915]
> > [   27.249788]        drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5d/0xb0 [drm]
> > [   27.249792]        drm_ioctl+0x31b/0x3d0 [drm]
> > [   27.249793]        do_vfs_ioctl+0xa6/0x6c0
> > [   27.249794]        SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> > [   27.249796]        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
> > [   27.249797] 
> >                other info that might help us debug this:
> > 
> > [   27.249798]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > 
> > [   27.249799]        CPU0                    CPU1
> > [   27.249799]        ----                    ----
> > [   27.249800]   lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > [   27.249801]                                lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
> > [   27.249802]                                lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > [   27.249803]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
> > [   27.249804] 
> >                 *** DEADLOCK ***
> > 
> > [   27.249806] 1 lock held by Xorg/1344:
> > [   27.249806]  #0:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc04c6c6b>] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x19b/0x350 [i915]
> > [   27.249820] 
> >                stack backtrace:
> > [   27.249822] CPU: 0 PID: 1344 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.13.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc27.x86_64 #1
> > [   27.249823] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z97X-UD5H/Z97X-UD5H, BIOS F8 06/17/2014
> > [   27.249824] Call Trace:
> > [   27.249827]  dump_stack+0x8e/0xd6
> > [   27.249828]  print_circular_bug+0x1b6/0x210
> > [   27.249830]  __lock_acquire+0x1367/0x13b0
> > [   27.249832]  lock_acquire+0xa3/0x1f0
> > [   27.249834]  ? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x1f0
> > [   27.249846]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x118/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249858]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x118/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249860]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.9+0xa1/0x10c0
> > [   27.249871]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x118/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249873]  ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x30
> > [   27.249875]  ? __lock_is_held+0x65/0xb0
> > [   27.249877]  ww_mutex_lock+0x5e/0x70
> > [   27.249878]  ? ww_mutex_lock+0x5e/0x70
> > [   27.249889]  i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x118/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249901]  i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x1b4/0x350 [i915]
> > [   27.249912]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x330/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249917]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5d/0xb0 [drm]
> > [   27.249922]  drm_ioctl+0x31b/0x3d0 [drm]
> > [   27.249933]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x330/0x330 [i915]
> > [   27.249935]  ? __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
> > [   27.249937]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa6/0x6c0
> > [   27.249939]  SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> > [   27.249941]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
> > [   27.249942] RIP: 0033:0x7fa9f27a0277
> > [   27.249943] RSP: 002b:00007ffe2177ef28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> > [   27.249944] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa9e37c78a8 RCX: 00007fa9f27a0277
> > [   27.249945] RDX: 00007ffe2177ef30 RSI: 00000000c0106461 RDI: 000000000000000d
> > [   27.249945] RBP: 00007fa9e32ac180 R08: 00000000017cd900 R09: 00000000017cd900
> > [   27.249946] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe2177eff0
> > [   27.249947] R13: 00000000017a7020 R14: 00000000017a6fb8 R15: 0000000000000000
> > [   29.049706] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c3.
> > [   29.081546] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   29.160756] systemd-logind[871]: New session c4 of user gdm.
> > [   29.334968] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c4.
> > [   29.360063] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   30.953645] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c5.
> > [   30.984611] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   31.001911] systemd-logind[871]: New session c6 of user gdm.
> > [   32.579152] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c6.
> > [   32.609583] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   32.627687] systemd-logind[871]: New session c7 of user gdm.
> > [   34.018140] systemd-journald[1970]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   34.018522] systemd-journald[1970]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   34.027269] systemd-journald[1972]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   34.027502] systemd-journald[1972]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   34.036590] systemd-journald[1973]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   34.036800] systemd-journald[1973]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   34.045227] systemd-journald[1975]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   34.045477] systemd-journald[1975]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   34.054090] systemd-journald[1977]: Failed to map sequential number file, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [   34.054306] systemd-journald[1977]: Failed to open runtime journal: Permission denied
> > [   34.325938] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c7.
> > [   34.362383] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   34.377764] systemd-logind[871]: New session c8 of user gdm.
> > [   36.152022] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c8.
> > [   36.181666] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   36.197316] systemd-logind[871]: New session c9 of user gdm.
> > [   37.983927] systemd-logind[871]: Removed session c9.
> > [   38.014761] systemd-logind[871]: Failed to remove runtime directory /run/user/42: Permission denied
> > [   53.316947] systemd-logind[871]: New session 10 of user bwang.
> > 
> > 
> > It seems there is something wrong with the systemd and the file system journal
> > part.
> > 
> > Anyone knows what the problem is?
> 
> I sent a mail out just the other day about this and other issues caused
> by a new SELinux permission being introduced. Try booting with
> enforcing=0 . A new selinux-policy-targeted build should show up for
> you soon which is expected to fix most of the problems.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> _______________________________________________
> test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux