Re: Poor experience on Dnfdragora compared to Yumex-dnf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5 August 2017 at 08:06, Allan Mwenda <allanitomwesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello I've been using Fedora 26 LXQt and my experience with the new update manager dnfdragora has been poor bot on 64bit and 32bit to the point where i switched back to Yumex-dnf which is much more reliable.
Dnfdragora takes ages to open, and even longer to load updates. It also crashes when you open a rpm with some kind of qt error, i was unable to open RPMfusion with it. All this works fine on Yumex-dnf and more importantly i think, works quickly. 

As F26 is now released, you should post this to the Fedora User list, not here. 

poc
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux