On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 02:01 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > Firstly, it may occur if it is agreed to be very unlikely that the bug
> > can possibly be fixed within a reasonable time frame for the release to
> > be made. For instance, fixing the bug may be a task of such technical
> > complexity that it cannot possibly be achieved for several weeks or
> > months, and it may be held that such a delay would be too disruptive to
> > Fedora's development to be justified.
>
> "cannot possibly" — that's pretty strong words. I sure almost anything
> could be achieved in several months, if enough people banded up to do it.
> So I'd just keep the first sentence, without "possibly", and drop the
> rest of the paragraph. That'd cut down on the wordiness too.
Good point, thanks.
> > It is expected that in almost 'exceptional' cases, the bug will be
> > accepted as a blocker either for the very next milestone release, or
> > for the equivalent milestone for the next release (e.g. if this
> > 'exceptional' provision is agreed to apply to a bug that otherwise
> > would have blocked {{FedoraVersion|long|next}} Final, it should be
> > accepted as a blocker either for {{FedoraVersion|long|next2}} Alpha or
> > {{FedoraVersion|long|next2}} Final).
>
> "almost" seems misplaced, or maybe you meant "almost all".
Indeed, you're exactly correct. Thank you.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
