Re: Criteria proposal: virt guest at Alpha

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Mike Ruckman <roshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:39:20PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> At the Go/No-Go meeting today, we agreed in principle that major bugs
>> in virt guest functionality should come under the Alpha criteria, not
>> the Beta criteria as before. When we established the virt criteria, use
>> of virtual machines for pre-release testing wasn't as widespread as it
>> is now.
>>
>> Having looked at the criteria, I think a simple change can achieve
>> this. We simply move this single criterion from Beta to Alpha:
>>
>> "The release must install and boot successfully as a virtual guest in a
>> situation where the virtual host is running the current stable Fedora
>> release."
>>
>> The other criterion would remain at Beta:
>>
>> "The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same
>> release."
>>
>> I believe just this change should suffice to implement the intent: that
>> virt guest functionality block Alpha, but virt host functionality block
>> Beta.
>>
>> Does this sound good to everyone? Thanks!
>> --
>> Adam Williamson
>> Fedora QA Community Monkey
>> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
>> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
> That sounds good to me. I think both of those make sense and get where
> we're trying to go.

It sounds good for me as well.

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux