Re: criterion adjustment proposal: demote optical media support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1 looks great.

On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 08:41 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as discussed in "future of official optical media support in Fedora"
> thread in devel list [1], we agreed to decrease the importance and
> testing of optical media support for Fedora release composes, and
> block on just several specific images. This is a concrete proposal to
> adjust our release criteria to match the outcome of the discussion.
> The outcome is that we will not block on broken optical support for
> any Alpha/Beta composes, and we will block on optical support for
> Final composes only for Workstation Live and Everything netinst image
> (please note that I didn't receive much feedback for my last point
> where I suggested Everything netinst is made release blocking [2] -
> if you have something to add, there's still time).
> 
> 
> == Don't block on Alpha/Beta adjustment ==
> 
> 1. On page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Alpha_Release_Cri
> teria#Release-blocking_images_must_boot the first sentence under
> "Supported media types" section changes from:
> > Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when
> > written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and
> > when written to a USB stick with at least one of the officially
> > supported methods.
> 
> to
> > Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when
> > written to a USB stick with at least one of the officially
> > supported methods.
> 
> 2. On page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Beta_Release_Crit
> eria#Release-blocking_images_must_boot the first sentence under
> "Supported media types" section changes from:
> > Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when
> > written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and
> > when written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported
> > methods.
> 
> to
> > Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when
> > written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported
> > methods.
> 
> 3. On page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Final_Release_Cri
> teria we add "Initialization requirements" header with "Release-
> blocking images must boot" sub-header (same as in Alpha/Beta) with
> text:
> > All release-blocking images must boot in their supported
> > configurations.
> > Supported media types [hide]
> > Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when
> > written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and
> > when written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported
> > methods.
> > Difference from Beta [hide]
> > This criterion differs from the similar Beta criterion only in that
> > it requires all supported images to work when written also to an
> > optical media, not just USB sticks.
> 
> 
> == Block only on Workstation Live and Everything netinst change ==
> 
> 1. On page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/R
> eleaseBlocking/Fedora26 we add another column to the all the tables
> called "optical boot is release blocking". The cells will have value
> "yes" for Workstation Live x86_64 and Everything netinst x86_64,
> value "no" for all other rows containing "release blocking = yes",
> and will be grayed out for rows containing "release blocking = no".
> 
> (We link to this page from Alpha/Beta/Final release criteria pages
> from the last sentence in the description in the top of the page.)
> 
> 
> == Wiki adjustments ==
> 
> 1. On page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Installation_test_
> matrix#Default_boot_and_install_.28x86_64.29 we change "Expected
> coverage" box from:
> > For Alpha and Beta, we expect a reasonable sampling of tests across
> > the table, with at least some testing for all three media types,
> > both firmware types, and each major class of deliverable (netinst,
> > live and DVD). For Final, we expect full coverage for all the Alpha
> > / Final rows.
> 
> to
> > For Alpha and Beta, we expect a reasonable sampling of tests across
> > the table, with at least some testing for VM and USB boot method,
> > both firmware types, and each major class of deliverable (netinst,
> > live and DVD). Optical boot testing is optional at this stage. For
> > Final, we expect full coverage for the Alpha / Final rows with VM
> > and USB boot method. Optical boot testing in Final is mandatory for
> > [[Fedora_Program_Management/ReleaseBlocking/Fedora26|supported
> > images]].
> 
> 
> Wording improvements or any other feedback welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kamil
> 
> [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorap
> roject.org/thread/KICRVUS3YHNTLHY47O5A2XL2C5YMCFIH/
> [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorap
> roject.org/message/VQQXMJ7QMTLNRFRI5VYIKGIU5IV2W6KB/
> _______________________________________________
> test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux