Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 11:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > So after some further consideration I think I'm on board with this, and
> > it turned out not to be too hard to implement. I have updated the draft
> > test case:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Testcase_Boot_default_install
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> VM BIOS/UEFI assumes attaching the ISO file to a virtual optical
> device; not a virtual drive, correct? Does it make sense to make this
> explicit?

As I said in the original proposal, I'm not worrying too hard about the
VM case, because it's more or less entirely there to get filled in by
openQA. Humans can add results if they like, but it's not really that
important.

The test case does actually state this, though:

"If testing in a virtual machine, attach the image to the virtual
machine as a CD or DVD."

> I take it there's been actual cases of ISO files booting in the VM as
> a virtual optical device; that when burned did not boot from physical
> optical media?

Yes, that was the case with the F21 syslinux bug -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148087 - which is why it
took us a while to catch it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux