On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 > > > > source rpm and > > > > give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and install > > > > it then the > > > > requirement of VirtualBox should be met without the > > > > dependencyLuxemburgo confessa agora que foi longe de mais, mas > > > > era inevitável. "Hoje não o faria, mas pela forma como se > > > > acercou de mim... Nenhum dirigente pode falar assim a um > > > > treinador ou a um jogador quando a adrenalina ainda está a > > > > correr". side effects > > > > above. > > > https://smani.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx-1.5.0-1.fc26.src.rpm > > Well done Sandro, I see you've taken care to clean up the extra > > installed files, > > this should work just fine Joachim. > Hi Ian Kent and Sandro Mani, > > this worked flawlessly (The only additional thing I had to do was to > install /usr/bin/rpmbuild). After having installed the newly built > rpm, > I could install a working VirtualBox. > > Tank you very much. May I recomend you rpmfusion rpms ? I am the packager maintainer and any feedback is welcome) http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox > Joachim Backes > -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
