Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160924.n.0 compose check report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 21:13 +0000, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
> 
> 
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> 
> 
> Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> 
> 
> Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160923.n.0):

Since I didn't explain these yet...

> ID: 35882	Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35882

Seems like the 'getting started' screen still isn't appearing here,
though it started working again on x86_64 (and works on the i386 live
test). Haven't looked into why yet.

> ID: 35883	Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35883

Still https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 ;.

> ID: 35896	Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35896

Still initial-setup bugs.

> ID: 35943	Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35943

This run actually hit a Mystery Anaconda Crash, but aside from that,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378156 is still live.

> ID: 35957	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35957

Looks like the same as the F25 upgrade fail, we just didn't wait long
enough...I tweaked the timeouts from 90 to 120 seconds, should help.

> ID: 35974	Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35974

This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376638 ;.

> ID: 35984	Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35984

Still https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333591 .

> Soft failed openQA tests: 1/102 (x86_64)
> (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
> 
> 
> New soft failures (same test did not softfail in Rawhide-20160923.n.0):
> 
> 
> ID: 35890	Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35890

This is a new 'soft fail'. When this test 'soft fails' it indicates
that the test had to authenticate for the package update to proceed,
which usually means there were unsigned packages in the update. This
has been normal for Rawhide up until now, but puiterwijk tells me that
as of Monday Rawhide packages should be auto-signed(!!!), so I decided
to make this case a 'soft fail', as in future this test should
hopefully never run into an unsigned package. For now Rawhide does
still have some unsigned packages, hence the soft fail.
> 
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux