Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160608.n.0 compose check report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 15:56 +0000, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
> 
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Kde raw-xz armhfp
> Minimal raw-xz armhfp
> 
> Failed openQA tests: 17/77 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386)
> 
> ID: 21168	Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21168
> ID: 21169	Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21169
> ID: 21174	Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21174
> ID: 21175	Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21175
> ID: 21176	Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21176
> ID: 21177	Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21177

These all appear to be due to SELinux denials preventing GDM from
running: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342732 ;(and the
'See Also' bugs). Booting with 'enforcing=0' works.

> ID: 21178	Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21178

This has been broken for a long time:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864
just waiting for someone to fix it.

> ID: 21179	Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21179
> ID: 21180	Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21180
> ID: 21185	Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21185

There were three problems here: the anaconda icon on the KDE live
desktop had changed, liveuser can't run 'reboot' any more (so rebooting
after install wasn't working; I just changed it to run 'sudo reboot'
instead), and the kicker icon in Rawhide KDE is not the Fedora logo
like openQA expects it to be (this happened to F24 as well and was
fixed there, but seems to still be broken in Rawhide):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344118
I fixed the reboot and icon things, and added a 'workaround' needle for
the upstream kicker icon, so the test now 'soft fails' (which is really
more of a 'pass-with-warning' thing).

> ID: 21196	Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21196

This ran into some kind of bizarre dnf / dependency issue with plymouth
when doing 'dnf groupinstall base-x'. We (halfline and I) are really
not sure what happened, but we're gonna see if it goes away tomorrow.

> ID: 21204	Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21204
> ID: 21215	Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21215

This (and the i386 one below) is due to a plymouth bug preventing the
passphrase entry prompt being displayed on boot of the installed
system: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344141

> ID: 21218	Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21218
> ID: 21219	Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21219

These don't work because Rawhide anaconda is currently being built
without translations due to a msgfmt bug that prevents it building with
them, so there's just no French or Russian translations for the tests
to use.

> ID: 21232	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21232
> ID: 21233	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21233
> ID: 21236	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21236
> ID: 21237	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21237
> ID: 21245	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21245
> ID: 21251	Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21251
> ID: 21256	Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21256
> ID: 21355	Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21355

I haven't looked into these in a lot of detail yet,
but...upgrade_2_server fails due to a dep issue with a to-be-retired
package, the desktop tests are probably failing due to the same SELinux
issue as the Workstation live and netinst tests, and the minimal tests
seem to fail oddly - the upgrade runs OK and the upgraded system simply
fails to boot, just sits there in the boot sequence. I'll try and find
some time to look at it later.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux