Re: Call for F24 Final blocker / FE votes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 13:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! We currently have quite a backlog of proposed blocker bugs
> for F24. Unfortunately I forgot to schedule a special blocker meeting
> for yesterday or today, so we don't have one till Monday. To help
> clarify the F24 situation it'd be great if folks could vote in-bug for
> all the proposed blockers and, if possible, the proposed FEs. You can
> find the bugs here:
> 
> https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/final/buglist
> 
> we welcome votes from anyone, but votes from regular blocker meeting
> attendees will likely be weighted a bit higher in the Patented Fuzzy
> Blocker Voting System (wherein I look at all the votes and decide what
> to do...muahahahahahaha, the power). Please read
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process before voting
> if you're not familiar with the process, and if in doubt, just vote
> however I voted ;)))
> 
> By "vote in-bug" I just mean write a comment with your vote (e.g. "+1
> blocker" or "-1 blocker") and any thoughts/comments you have.
> 
> Thanks everyone!

Sorry, one thing I should have emphasized for new voters: blocker
voting is not a case of "in my completely arbitrary opinion, this bug
should or should not be a blocker". There are rules about what bugs can
be blockers: to be a blocker the bug must violate one of the
requirements described in the release criteria. If you judge that the
bug clearly violates the criteria you must vote +1 *even if you don't
agree with the criteria* - and vice versa, if you judge that the bug
does not clearly violate the criteria you must vote -1 *even if you
think that on its merits the bug ought to be a blocker* (the
appropriate course of action if many people think this is to propose a
new criterion, get it adopted, and then re-consider the bug).

The proposed blockers should all have comments from the person who
proposed them citing the criterion they believe is violated (or
sometimes there's a later comment providing this, when the original
proposer missed it), and other comments may be helpful in informing
your decision.

Thanks!

The criteria pages:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux