Re: Fedora 24 Final blocker bug status mail #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi folks! The Final freeze kicks in soon, so time for another blocker
> bug update.
>
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318045 - anaconda - NEW
>    Incorrect keymap when decrypting encrypted partitions
>
> This one still needs some investigation, we know the proximate cause
> but not what's ultimately causing *that*. I spent last week on the
> other keyboard bug, so if no-one else gets to this one this week, I
> guess that's what I'll be doing.

Probably completely unrelated but we've had an issue on aarch64 with
plymouth and unlocking encrypted partitions for reference.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172740

> 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320273 - grub2 - NEW
>    chainloading bootmgr.efi on UEFI results in error: out of memory
>
> I know pjones has been working on this one from IRC chat, but obviously
> he's not all of the way there yet. There aren't really many other
> people who can help with this, unfortunately...
>
> 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333106 - selinux-policy - MODIFIED
>    Server deployment fails due to SELinux policy changes on current Fedora Rawhide and F24 (2016-05-21)
>
> An update has just appeared for this, so we (Server WG folks and QA
> folks) will need to test it.
>
> 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333998 - systemd - MODIFIED
>    After Russian install, console keymap is 'us', not 'ru'
>
> I more or less worked this one out last week; I've sent a PR that should
> improve things from the anaconda end, and systemd has also improved
> things on their end. We'll need a new compose containing the updated
> systemd to verify that fix.
>
> 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293167 - kf5-kinit - NEW
>    [abrt] kf5-kinit: qt_message_fatal(): kdeinit5 killed by SIGABRT
>
> This was previously an accepted blocker, but at today's blocker review
> meeting we agreed to kick it back to proposed, because the impact seems
> to be less broad than was initially thought (it may be graphics driver-
> dependent). We would like the QA folks who've been active on this -
> kparal and pschindl - to re-test based on the findings of other people
> who've posted in the bug, then we can re-consider the blocker status.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux