On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > with F24 Beta: > > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we > can spin a 'release candidate': > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 > > a kernel is building that is expected to fix the first, and hughsie is > testing a fix for the second as we speak. Once we have both fixes in > bodhi I'll request a release candidate compose and we'll hopefully have > time to blow through testing ahead of go/no-go. So unfortunately there was a bit of a communication breakdown between hughsie and myself, I think - he built the fix for the second bug in COPR and requested testing, but I was waiting for a Koji/Bodhi build for some reason. For anyone who wants to test it, the COPR is here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rhughes/f23-gnome320/build/181352/ (only built for F23 for some reason) - please do try it out and give feedback. But we can't do an F24 RC with this issue outstanding, really. We could try an extremely dodgy 'it's not really a blocker' fudge or some kind of heroic attempt for a drive-by packager to apply the changes to the official packages, but I'm not sure either of those is a great idea unless there's some kind of insanely pressing reason to get the Beta out on schedule. I'd rather take the time to consider it properly. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
