Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 10:13 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 01/12/2016 08:37 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Do you have some other ideas/proposals, in general or in some
>> > > specific
>> > > situations regarding the slip length?
>> > >
>> > I'm wondering if there would be interest in hosting a file
>> > containing
>> > upgrade requirements for each version.  For example it could have
>> > the
>> > package version requirements needed for a successful upgrade.  The
>> > upgrade
>> > tool could check that and warn the user.
>>
>> One of my concerns is the state of ca-legacy, and whether and how
>> this
>> gets disabled on upgrades. I'm sure there are some other things that
>> have ex post facto unsafe defaults that just stick around through
>> upgrades rather than being reset to new defaults. In my opinion that
>> would violate the Workstation PRD "Upgrading the system multiple
>> times
>> through the upgrade process should give a result that is the same as
>> an original install of Fedora Workstation."
>
> This all seems out of scope, as Kamil said. Can we please stick to the
> non-media blocker policy discussion here? General concerns / ideas for
> upgrades, and specific potential upgrade issues, should get their own
> threads.
>
> It's very likely true that upgraded systems get increasingly out of
> whack with freshly installed ones when it comes to default
> configurations of various packages - especially ones which don't use
> the modular, multiply-overridden configuration style, and thus can't
> easily update the distribution defaults post-install - but this doesn't
> really seem to have much to do with the question of what the release
> process policies WRT non-media blockers should be.

Yep, it's true my was vaguely, unintentionally, in the vicinity of, a
drive-by / hijacking.


-- 
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux