On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 07:52 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > 1) Way back when we were doing Anaconda-based upgrades, I think it > amounted to a technological limitation (please correct me if my > information is wrong here). I think it wasn't exactly technically *impossible*, but it was significantly more likely that some kind of problem would emerge, with that much heavier system. > 2) The QA impact is non-zero when attempting to support two-version > upgrades, but since this recommendation is coming *from* prominent QA > team members, I'm assuming that this is a non-issue. Not exactly a non-issue, but we at least have the ability to automate this testing quite effectively now. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
