================================== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting ================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-11-23/fedora-qa.2015-11-23-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll call (adamw, 16:00:13) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:03:21) * "adamw to draft up proposal for better handling of 'special blockers'" - yep, did that, and we'll be discussing the draft later in the meeting (adamw, 16:04:13) * "adamw to finish off the 'installer help' criteria / test case changes" - did that: can't find the link in new hyperkitty mailing list archive, but trust me, I did it (adamw, 16:06:18) * "adamw to work with releng to get rawhide nightly boot.iso compose working and create an initial f24 nightly validation event" - did that too, nirik fixed all the things stopping nightly composes and we have nightly validation events going now (adamw, 16:07:03) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Installation (satellit, 16:13:41) * satellit reports ongoing problems with Rawhide image compose and install (adamw, 16:14:08) * Non-media blocker process (adamw, 16:14:28) * AGREED: QA is generally in favour of changing the process to include some kind of check on the status of blocker-fixing updates as an input to go/no-go (adamw, 16:44:49) * ACTION: kparal to look further into the details of go/no-go process and propose a practical policy for changing it to cover blockers fixed by updates (adamw, 16:47:16) * Open floor (adamw, 16:48:01) * ACTION: kparal to check with dnf-system-upgrade maintainers if they're OK with blocking on N+2 upgrades (adamw, 16:55:51) Meeting ended at 17:00:04 UTC. Action Items ------------ * kparal to look further into the details of go/no-go process and propose a practical policy for changing it to cover blockers fixed by updates * kparal to check with dnf-system-upgrade maintainers if they're OK with blocking on N+2 upgrades Action Items, by person ----------------------- * kparal * kparal to look further into the details of go/no-go process and propose a practical policy for changing it to cover blockers fixed by updates * kparal to check with dnf-system-upgrade maintainers if they're OK with blocking on N+2 upgrades * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (86) * kparal (60) * dgilmore (16) * roshi (11) * sgallagh (10) * linuxmodder (10) * satellit_e (10) * tflink (5) * zodbot (4) * garretraziel (4) * pschindl (3) * nirik (1) * satellit (1) * danofsatx (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
