On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:36:16 -0800 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > #2 MOAR METADATA > ---------------- > > The alternative is to make the existing Blocker trackers do more work. > In this model we wouldn't add any new tracker bugs; we'd just add new > 'magic words' in the Whiteboard field. Right now, an accepted blocker > is identified by the string 'AcceptedBlocker' appearing in the > whiteboard field. We could simply add some more magical strings like > that: 'Accepted0Day' and 'AcceptedStable', say (better suggestions > welcome). > > I kind of like this idea as it's less change and involves creating > fewer new bugs. We'd have to make some changes to blockerbugs either > way - tflink can say if either approach would be more work in > blockerbugs, but I'm gonna guess they'd be fairly similar. Yeah, I think that either approach would involve a similar amount of effort to change blockerbugs. #2 would be slightly less effort but it's not much. Once the approach is decided, we can file RFEs for blockerbugs and get that work landed before F24 alpha. Tim
Attachment:
pgpnEbwk5zdHf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
