On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 20:11 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@fedoraproj > ect.org > > wrote: > > > Hi folks! So as we noticed today, we have no test case / criterion > > to > > ensure the anaconda help actually works. (Note it was only > > introduced > > in Fedora 21 or 22). I have written a test case: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_help > > > > and I'm proposing we add a Final criterion: > > > > * Any element in the installer interface(s) which is clearly > > intended > > to display 'help' text must do so correctly when activated. > > > > We could also require that the intended 'Help' elements must be > > present, but that's a slightly tighter requirement - I'd ask for > > the > > anaconda team's opinion on whether we should do that or not. If we > > don't do that, then if by some chance the Help buttons were > > entirely > > *absent*, that would not be a blocker - only if buttons are present > > but > > don't work would it be a blocker. > > > > I'm proposing we add the criterion, and add the test case to the > > 'Miscellaneous' table of the Installation matrix. > > > > As we discussed this on Go/No-Go meeting: validity of this criteria > will > start with F24 release. There are no plans to use this criteria for > F23. > Right Adam ? That was the idea, yeah, though it seems like we're currently scrambling to try and do a build with some kind of fix... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
