Hey folks! So several people have commented in the past that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_updates is kind of a mess, and I think that's correct. I think we were trying to make things 'efficient' at the time by exercising several different things in one test, but it really does result in a messy, hard-to-comprehend test case. So, I propose we split it into three separate test cases, and I've drafted them up: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_base_upd ate_cli https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_desktop_ update_graphical https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_desktop_ update_notification The first would be an Alpha test case in the Base (not desktop) results page, and just covers installing updates with yum/dnf. The second would be a Beta test case in the Desktop page, and covers installing updates from a graphical desktop. The third would be a Final test case in the Desktop page, and covers notification of available updates. I'm also planning to draft some additional test cases covering package installation and removal tomorrow - mainly for the test day we have coming up, but it would probably not be a bad idea to have them as release validation tests as well. What do folks think? Does this look like an improvement? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
