On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 09:14 +0100, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > I think it's not a bug, the warning is clear enough. I'd say that > this > feature is not ready yet, but the developers are aware of it and know > it's missing. The message is like a placeholder that warns users, but > it's not a real error/exception. > > But hey, this is just my opinion and experienced users may know > something I don't :)... I would leave out the "yet" here. Nautilus, the application, works just fine under Wayland. Nautilus, the former desktop component, does not and we don't have high-priority plans to change that. The classic session will continue to use X for now. What we do plan wrt. to the nautilus desktop window is to move it to a separate process, so that the nautilus application can stop carrying this ballast. > > Regards > > // Giulio (juliuxpigface) > > > > On 03/28/2015 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > > Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging > > > > in, I > > > > see > > > > no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a > > > > gnome-terminal, I see the following message: > > > > > > > > > > > > ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported > > > > on X11. > > > > Desktop not created. > > > > > > > > Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on > > > > Gnome/Wayland? > > > > > > Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on > > > Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? > > > > > > > Is this a bug or a feature? Additionally, will this mean that > > nautilus > > will be never running under wayland? > > > > Joachim Backes > > > > -- > > > > Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) > > Kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22.x86_64 > > > > > > Joachim Backes <joachim.backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes > > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
