On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 21:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Low priority: I'm tempted to nominate this year old bug as a final > blocker under the data corruption provision. And I'm wondering what > people think of this. I would vote -1 on it. > The bug is an RFE so making it a blocker is, well, it's 50% RFE and > 50% data corruption bug, and is an odd duck way of getting it fixed > but there's no traction in a year, not even a comment. The release blocker system is for correctly identifying *release blocker* bugs, it's not a generic 'flag for attention' system. That was what we had before with the FXXTarget bugs, but no-one ever really paid much attention to them. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
