On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 17:39 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Looks like those Red Hat Security guys want to predefine what > security is exactly for people over the globe, that's some kinda > superflous thing I'm confused. It has nothing at all to do with Red Hat Security, and I'm not sure what anyone's accomplishing by rehashing the same points that were already made multiple times in the first thread. If they didn't change the devs' mind then, I don't think they're going to now. Do we really need to waste the bytes? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
