On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 18:49 -0700, Bodhi Zazen wrote: > Found my bug on this - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157258 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#environment-product-conflicts and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1160917 , which are kind of in the same genre. Basically it's a limitation of the somewhat icky way products/flavors are currently implemented. There's a long-term plan to do it much more nicely which requires certain RPM capabilities that it doesn't have yet; apparently we're *hoping* they arrive in F23. I have floated to mattdm/sgallagh the possibility of simplifying the current attempt to handle -config-(product) subpackages. Currently the idea is they get pulled in when the package that needs the config is installed, relying on some rather specific RPM depsolving behaviour. IMHO this leads to more trouble than it's worth, especially since the only -config-(product) packages we actually *have* are ones which it would be pretty safe to simply stick directly in the relevant env groups, as the packages that use them should pretty much always be installed. But there's some details to be worked out if we want to change that, too. I'd agree with Pete that this isn't *really* something we intend to 'support'; you're supposed to pick a product by, well, installing that product (and, as a one-time thing, on fedup from <21). You're not really supposed to 'convert' installs like this. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
