2015-01-26 @ 1700 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==========================================

Meeting started by roshi at 17:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-01-26/f22-blocker-review.2015-01-26-17.00.log.html
.


Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (roshi, 17:00:18)

* Introduction  (roshi, 17:02:32)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (roshi, 17:02:32)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (roshi, 17:02:36)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (roshi, 17:02:39)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (roshi, 17:02:41)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (roshi,
    17:02:44)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (roshi,
    17:02:46)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (roshi, 17:02:49)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (roshi, 17:02:52)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
    (roshi, 17:02:55)

* (1184453) mouse cursor is invisible for 1 minute after log in, g-s-d
  seems to be stuck waiting for cups  (roshi, 17:04:14)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184453   (roshi,
    17:04:17)
  * Proposed Blocker, cups, NEW  (roshi, 17:04:19)
  * AGREED: - 1184453 - AcceptedBlocker for Beta - This bug
    conditionally violates the Alpha criterion ""It must be possible to
    run the default web browser and a terminal application from all
    release-blocking desktop environments." by making it
    difficult/impossible to do anything within the GUI, the violation is
    considered serious enough to block Beta but not Alpha  (adamw,
    17:14:51)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting#Secretary_Duty
    (roshi, 17:19:06)

* (1185195) SELinux is preventing NetworkManager from 'create' accesses
  on the lnk_file .resolv.conf.NetworkManager.  (roshi, 17:19:45)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185195   (roshi,
    17:19:48)
  * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, NEW  (roshi, 17:19:51)
  * AGREED: - 1185195 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug prevents anything
    requiring the network from working. Violates at least the following
    criterion: "The installed system must be able to download and
    install updates with the default console package manager."  (roshi,
    17:23:11)

* (1184933) login screen stuck after switching users  (roshi, 17:23:32)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184933   (roshi,
    17:23:32)
  * Proposed Blocker, gdm, MODIFIED  (roshi, 17:23:32)
  * ACTION: kparal to propose criteria change to the list regarding user
    switching  (roshi, 17:34:57)
  * AGREED: - 1184933 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a conditional
    violation of the criterion: "Shutting down, logging out and
    rebooting must work using standard console commands and the
    mechanisms offered (if any) by all release-blocking desktops." As
    "Switch User" is an offered mechanism.  (roshi, 17:36:03)

* (1185117) UEFI dual-boot + Windows, cannot practically remove and
  install Fedora over an existing default opensuse installation  (roshi,
  17:36:08)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185117   (roshi,
    17:36:11)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 17:36:14)
  * AGREED: - 1185117 - AcceptedBlocker for Beta - This bug is a
    violation of the Beta criterion: "Correctly interpret, and modify as
    described below, any disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and
    partition table containing ext4 partitions, LVM and/or btrfs
    volumes..."  (roshi, 17:45:18)

* (1182652) Missing high contrast icon  (roshi, 17:45:57)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182652   (roshi,
    17:45:57)
  * Proposed Blocker, setroubleshoot, NEW  (roshi, 17:45:57)
  * AGREED: - 1182652 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the
    criterion: "All applications installed by default in Fedora
    Workstation must comply with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the
    Applications and Launchers policy."  (roshi, 17:49:40)

* Open Floor  (roshi, 17:49:49)

Meeting ended at 17:58:54 UTC.

Action Items
------------
* kparal to propose criteria change to the list regarding user switching

Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* kparal
  * kparal to propose criteria change to the list regarding user
    switching
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)

People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* roshi (114)
* adamw (82)
* kparal (38)
* danofsatx (27)
* pschindl (8)
* zodbot (4)
* tonghuix (4)
* oddshocks (1)

Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

-- 
// Mike 
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux