On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:46:34PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Here's a ping on this (as I only got feedback from Mike before - > anyone else?) and a modification: I'd like to extend the Beta > criterion to read: > > "When installing with a release-blocking dedicated installer image, > the default package set must be correct, and choosing a different > package set must work." > > with a footnote something like: > > "'work' means that the package set selection mechanism itself must > work; when used, the packages that form the chosen set must actually > be the ones marked for installation. Package issues that render one or > more selectable package sets un-installable do not constitute a > violation of this criterion, though they may be violations of other > criteria." > > this is to cover things like > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179362 , which I noticed > when filing it is a bit of a loophole in the proposed criteria. > > Any more thoughts, folks? Thanks! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net That addition to the proposed criteria sounds good to me. The definition of 'work' makes sense as well. -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
