On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 11:20 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > We had a ticket come up in the blocker meeting today, where I got > the feeling that people felt that any major breakage that was > language dependent should be a blocker. We sort of fudged this into a > blocker using a different criterion, but I think if that is the > intent we should > note that being able to use English as a work around isn't good > enough. I don't know if we'd want to require all languages to work > like in the final criterion, but it did seem that multiple languages > not working for installation was considered to be a blocker issue > for alpha. Sure, it might be an idea to draft an Alpha criterion based on the Final one in that case... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
