On 12/08/2014 08:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 07:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just for the purpose of testing upgrade.img, you can simply enable
updates-testing if it turns out you have a situation like this and you
need a package from u-t to make the upgrade package set viable.
This is not true. They are completely different scenarios.
The purpose of using "release"+"updates"+"updates-testing" is entirely
different from using "release"+"updates", esp. in stages like these.
The purpose of using "release"+"updates" is to test upgrading to
Fedora(N+1) (and testing fedup/yum/dnf-support ) and not to test
update-candidate packages from "update-testing".
I don't really see the distinction as important,
I consider this to be critically important ...
because it is a
perennially moving target in any case. After Tuesday, f21 will get a new
stable updates push every day.
... it is likely the #1 cause of users facing broken updates - Esp.
during time-frames shortly after releases like these.
I haven't checked details this time, but there a quite a few reports
indicating this has happened again with this release.
Ralf
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
