On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:11 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 11:43 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The definition of a Product is not, at present, 'has these and only > > exactly these packages installed', it's more 'has at least these > > packages installed'. It's all still being figured out, but it was > > considered reasonable to let people mark upgrading systems as a given > > product. Though yes, there are obviously problems here, like if you > > upgrade a system and mark it as 'Server' it won't necessarily get > > rolekit as that's in the comps group not a dependency of the -release > > package. > > > > That's actually incorrect. The way that --product flag in fedup works is > that it modifies the upgrade transaction to include the > @^server-product-environment env-group (which in turn explicitly > includes the fedora-release-server package). > > The net result is that an upgrade with the --product=server flag should > get you the union of the packages currently on your system plus those in > the standard Server install. Ah, thanks for the correction. I thought all it did was pull in the product package. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
