On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:26:26 +0100 poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems, some terms confuse you, so let me clarify for you, > development != unstable development versions can be unstable or stable or stable for some people and unstable for others. Typically, Development versions are where upstream is changing things for the next Major version. User interface could change, behavior could change, sometimes multiple times. We don't want users getting each of these changes and having to change their workflow or discover changes, we want to wait until the major release is out and we can document changes and users can upgrade on their schedule, not ours. > Fedora 21 includes a fair number of packages some of which are built > from what you call an unstable version, and some are even essential > system packages. Different upstream projects have a different lifecycles and development setup. For example gnome uses a similar setup where there is an an unstable development release, then a stable release. However, they are much more regular than Xfce in releases, so they know when they push a development version to rawhide, the final version will be out before the final Fedora stable version it's in. > > The Xfce is another word for stability, developed or released. I'm glad it's stable for you. kevin
Attachment:
pgpMpsXQDNPPN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
