On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 11:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > More criteria time, folks! > > So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS > X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a > consensus on exactly what should be required for Linux multi-boot. > > I think Chris will re-propose his last idea and we can discuss it a bit > more, but I'd like to suggest a more restricted criterion we can > hopefully agree on immediately for the short term: > How does that look? I think we had at least a consensus that this much > was reasonable, and we have two bugs currently that would likely violate > the proposed criterion: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825236 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964828 > > I think it's reasonable to consider these blockers for F21, but we > should justify it ASAP to give the devs sufficient time to fix them. pjones let me know he actually hadn't been aware of the previous discussion about Linux multi-boot, and indeed checking the archives it seems that discussion never made it to anaconda-devel (only the OS X portion). So my assumption that everyone was already kinda expecting this to be a Final requirement was wrong, and thus it doesn't make any sense to add this as a requirement for F21 Final (it'd be moving the goalposts on the developers far too late in the process). Let's say it's still a live proposal, but for F22 (Final), not F21. And I'll post it to a-d-l as well. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
