Re: BZ#1154235 (generic problem)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 14:28 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Has https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154235 been fixed in 
> Beta RC4?
> 
> While the live installs such as 
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-LXDE-x86_64-21_Beta-4.iso 
> come up as Fedora, then I build my own under mock using livecd-creator, 
> pointing to Fedora 21 repos, and using 
> /usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-livecd-lxde.ks for the configuration 
> file it comes up as generic.
> 
> I am re-spinning to pick up fixes.  I have not read every comment in BZ 
> 1154235 but the end is  that it is closed as fixed in errata. Just what 
> was fixed?
> 
> I believe that one possible way to circumvent the problem is to 
> specifically include "fedora-release" in my package list.
> 
> Comments?

Check you updated your spin-kickstarts checkout. The fix was in
fedora-live-base.ks , which now pulls in @fedora-release-nonproduct by
default, so anything including it will get that. The workstation
kickstart pulls in @workstation-product instead.

https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/commit/?h=f21&id=b9dc5f25e9ef7aa845c0f076a21c200ff0f596cb
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux