2014-10-22 @ 1600 UTC ** F21 Blocker Review Minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==========================================

Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-22/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-22-16.03.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (roshi, 16:03:35)

* Introduction  (roshi, 16:07:10)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (roshi, 16:07:11)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (roshi, 16:07:15)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (roshi, 16:07:17)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (roshi, 16:07:19)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (roshi,
    16:07:22)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (roshi,
    16:07:25)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (roshi, 16:07:27)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (roshi, 16:07:30)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria
    (roshi, 16:07:33)

* (1155014) DeviceCreateError: ("'NoneType' object has no attribute
  'name'", 'fedora-pool00')  (roshi, 16:08:01)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155014   (roshi,
    16:08:04)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST  (roshi, 16:08:07)
  * AGREED: - 1155014 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation
    of the Beta custom partitioning criteria: "Create mount points
    backed by ext4 partitions, LVM volumes or btrfs volumes..."  (roshi,
    16:17:52)

* (1155633) anaconda doesn't use "url --mirrorlist" option from
  kickstart, uses stage2 instead  (roshi, 16:18:03)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155633   (roshi,
    16:18:06)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 16:18:08)
  * LINK:
    https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_TC4/Server/x86_64/os/.treeinfo
    (adamw, 16:25:41)
  * AGREED: - 1155633 - RejectedBlocker - We were unable to reproduce
    this bug. If more information can be provided, please re-propose for
    Final.  (roshi, 16:31:23)

* (1155334) [abrt] bind: gssapi_destroy_signverify_ctx(): named killed
  by SIGBUS  (roshi, 16:31:51)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155334   (roshi,
    16:31:54)
  * Proposed Blocker, bind, NEW  (roshi, 16:31:56)
  * AGREED: - 1155334 - This is a clear violation of the Domain
    controller role Beta criteria: " Multiple clients must be able to
    enrol and unenrol in the domain..."  (roshi, 16:37:14)
  * LINK: http://grammarist.com/spelling/enrol-enroll/   (danofsatx,
    16:37:30)

* (1146580) Mislabelled /usr/sbin, /usr/bin after fedup  (roshi,
  16:38:22)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146580   (roshi,
    16:38:23)
  * Proposed Blocker, fedup-dracut, ASSIGNED  (roshi, 16:38:23)
  * LINK:
    https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-install-21&arch=x86_64
    isn't set up right now  (adamw, 16:49:54)
  * AGREED: - 1146580 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the upgrade
    requirements Beta criteria: "For each one of the release-blocking
    package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete an
    upgrade from a fully updated installation of the previous stable
    Fedora release with that package set installed. ... Upgraded system
    requirements: The upgraded system must meet all release criteria."
    (roshi, 16:52:20)

* (1071356) Racy startup of ipa.service, named.service and dirsrv.target
  (roshi, 16:52:32)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071356   (roshi,
    16:52:35)
  * Proposed Blocker, freeipa, NEW  (roshi, 16:52:37)
  * AGREED: - 1071356 - RejectedBlocker - A simple workaround exists for
    the bug, so it's not considered severe enough to block Beta. The
    CommonBugs page will be updated with the workaround.  (roshi,
    17:04:26)

* (1155352) Fedora 21 Beta: Roles do not report firewall status via
  rolectl  (roshi, 17:04:49)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155352   (roshi,
    17:04:52)
  * Proposed Blocker, rolekit, NEW  (roshi, 17:04:55)
  * LINK:
    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSfVRuIaX1eQrTUtTzpWqSyiAGmaX-Zi3-vE2WmtqZisLIDS_4hzbz7Xw
    (danofsatx, 17:05:19)
  * LINK:
    https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2014-October/001520.html
    (sgallagh, 17:09:26)

* (1155301) SELinux denies certmonger dbus requests during FreeIPA
  deployment with rolekit  (roshi, 17:12:12)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155301   (roshi,
    17:12:14)
  * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy-targeted, NEW  (roshi, 17:12:17)
  * AGREED: - 1155301 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation
    of the Roles beta criteria: "Release-blocking roles and the
    supported role configuration interfaces must meet the core
    functional Role Definition Requirements to the extent that supported
    roles can be successfully started, stopped, brought to a working
    configuration, and queried."  (roshi, 17:23:46)

* (1155329) SELinux is preventing named from create access on the file
  DNS_25 (during FreeIPA deployment via rolekit, F21 Beta TC4)  (roshi,
  17:24:06)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155329   (roshi,
    17:24:09)
  * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy-targeted, NEW  (roshi, 17:24:11)
  * AGREED: - 1155329 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the Roles
    beta criteria: "Release-blocking roles and the supported role
    configuration interfaces must meet the core functional Role
    Definition Requirements to the extent that supported roles can be
    successfully started, stopped, brought to a working configuration,
    and queried."  (roshi, 17:30:08)

* (1155026) Missing addon results in a traceback when %addon header
  options are specified  (roshi, 17:33:17)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155026   (roshi,
    17:33:20)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST  (roshi, 17:33:22)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155304 got closed
    as a dupe of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155301
    (adamw, 17:34:25)

* (1104682)  DomU boot failure: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s!
  [systemd-udevd:161]  (roshi, 17:40:53)
  * AGREED: - 1104682 - RejectedBlocker - This bug is predicated on
    having a less than common machine config and isn't considered
    serious enough in light of that to be considered a blocker.  (roshi,
    17:42:56)

* (1155026) Missing addon results in a traceback when %addon header
  options are specified  (roshi, 17:43:24)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155026   (roshi,
    17:46:40)
  * AGREED: - 1155026 - RejectedFreezeException - This bug doesn't seem
    to be hit enough to justify breaking freeze for. If it's more common
    than just for kickstart installations with %addon specified, please
    repropose with more information.  (roshi, 17:52:55)

* (1145122) Provide more debug output on errors  (roshi, 17:53:29)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145122   (roshi,
    17:53:29)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, initial-setup, POST  (roshi, 17:53:29)
  * AGREED: - 1145122 - AcceptedFreezeException - This fix would be
    great to get pulled in. However, only if the Beta release slips so
    we have time to test it properly.  (roshi, 18:02:20)

* (1149782) liveusb-creator creates non-booting Live USB  (roshi,
  18:02:31)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149782   (roshi,
    18:02:31)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, liveusb-creator, NEW  (roshi, 18:02:31)
  * AGREED: - 1149782 - RejectedFreezeException - Liveusb-creator works
    fine on F20 and F19 and a fix to this on F21 can be supplied via
    updates, so no need to pull it into the frozen package set.  (roshi,
    18:08:53)

* (1149610) CVE-2014-7272 sddm: several local privileges escalation
  issues  (roshi, 18:09:04)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149610   (roshi,
    18:09:07)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, vulnerability, NEW  (roshi, 18:09:10)
  * AGREED: - 1149610 - AcceptedFreezeException - Please pull this fix
    into the next compose despite freeze.  (roshi, 18:13:16)

* Open Floor  (roshi, 18:22:12)

Meeting ended at 18:24:15 UTC.


Action Items
------------

Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)

People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* roshi (207)
* adamw (146)
* kparal (65)
* sgallagh (54)
* dustymabe (30)
* danofsatx (30)
* jsmith (12)
* jskladan (7)
* zodbot (7)
* pwhalen (5)
* danofsatx-lt (2)
* satellit_e (2)
* satellit (1)
* jreznik_pp (1)
* agrimm (1)
* jreznik (1)

Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

-- 
// Mike 
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux