On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 09:53 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 17:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 11:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > > This is somewhat hard to read as it doesn't diff against the previous > > > text. A mail which just specified what you actually intend to change, or > > > a sandbox wiki page with a revision history that provides the diff, > > > would be most useful. > > > -- > > > Adam Williamson > > > Fedora QA Community Monkey > > > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > > > http://www.happyassassin.net > > > > > > > > > Perhaps > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_21_Beta_Release_Criteria_sgallagh_draft&diff=390666&oldid=390661 > > will work better? > > As this requirement is coming pretty late before Beta, do we have development > commitment to do required changes in fedup? I know Stephen, you were involved - > sorry, I didn't catch all the discussion - how does it look like? Do we have any > plan? I think it would be worth bringing it to today's FESCo meeting and I > understand how products upgrades fits into what we do in Fedora 21. So we > could be granted bigger slip. From the conversation I had with Kalev Lember and Will Woods, it doesn't seem like an enormous amount of work to get into the Beta, but I don't know at the moment how much progress has been made on that front. I'll check with Will and see.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
